Which of the following is a true statement regarding same-gender CFL availability for BCA?

The statement that there is no entitlement to same-gender CFLs accurately reflects the current policies regarding Body Composition Assessment (BCA) procedures. This means that while the presence of same-gender CFLs (Command Fitness Leaders) can be beneficial and is often provided for comfort and privacy during assessments, it is not mandated or guaranteed by policy. Instead, the emphasis is on ensuring that all personnel have access to a CFL for fitness assessments, regardless of gender, but the option for same-gender evaluation is based on availability rather than entitlement.

In this context, policies may encourage same-gender CFLs for assessments, but they do not obligate commands to provide them in every situation. This aligns with the broader equal access principles while maintaining flexibility in the operational environment. Hence, the absence of an entitlement structure is a fundamental aspect of the current stance on same-gender CFL availability for BCA.